Source: Hacker News
Article note: I've seen recent evidence that public chatterbots can beat the _median_ student at "pick all that apply" questions in computer engineering, in the sense that bots can swing a C and the students did their best to absorb nothing from the class.
The real deal is you _can not_ treat summative assessments that aren't regularly revised and taken in a controlled environment as reliable; the stakes and culture are such that a large fraction of students will "optimize" (cheat) to the best of their ability. Which sucks for instructors who have to deal with editing and scheduling and grading old-school exams, and students with test anxiety and such, but less than getting out-competed by a swarm of know-nothing bros whose test taking strategy only requires "Ctrl" "c" and "v."
Comments