Category Archives: News

Shared items and notes from my feeds and browsing. Subscribe as feed.

AMD Ryzen 5000 and Zen 3 on Nov 5th: +19% IPC, Claims Best Gaming CPU

Source: AnandTech Articles

Article note: AMD is still killin' it. Those look impressive and competitively priced, and are months ahead of Intel's planned next gen desktop parts.

Dr. Lisa Su, the CEO of AMD, has today announced the company’s next generation mainstream Ryzen processor. The new family, known as the Ryzen 5000 series, includes four parts and supports up to sixteen cores. The key element of the new product is the core design, with AMD’s latest Zen 3 microarchitecture, promising a 19% raw increase in performance-per-clock, well above recent generational improvements. The new processors are socket-compatible with existing 500-series motherboards, and will be available at retail from November 5th. AMD is putting a clear marker in the sand, calling one of its halo products as ‘The World’s Best Gaming CPU’.  We have details.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

IBM to split into two companies by end of 2021

Source: Ars Technica

Article note: Whut. All the "younger" big old players in computing have had ignominious deaths (Sun, SGI, etc.) as they crumbled. HP has disassociated into divisions that make _some_ sense. Etc. But here goes IBM, the biggest and oldest of the surviving computing institutions, on another decade of "No apparent direction." They mismanaged their consumer-facing divisions (everything about small systems...) to death in the 90s and 2000s and divested, and now appear to be flailing the same way at everything. What I can't tell from the announcement is where their technically interesting parts (POWER, surviving mainframe industries, Fabs, etc.) will land.

IBM announced this morning that the company would be spinning off some of its lower-margin lines of business into a new company and focusing on higher-margin cloud services. During an investor call, CEO Arvind Krishna acknowledged that the move was a "significant shift" in how IBM will work, but he positioned it as the latest in a decades-long series of strategic divestments.

"We divested networking back in the '90s, we divested PCs back in the 2000s, we divested semiconductors about five years ago because all of them didn’t necessarily play into the integrated value proposition," he said. Krishna became CEO in April 2020, replacing former CEO Ginni Rometty (who is now IBM's executive chairman), but the spin-off is the capstone of a multi-year effort to apply some kind of focus to the company's sprawling business model.

Cloudy with a chance of hitting the quarterly guidance

The new spin-off doesn't have a formal name yet and is referred to as "NewCo" in IBM's marketing and investor relations material. Under the spin-off plan, the press release claims IBM "will focus on its open hybrid cloud platform, which represents a $1 trillion market opportunity," while NewCo "will immediately be the world’s leading managed infrastructure services provider." (This is because NewCo will start life owning the entirety of IBM Global Technology Services' existing managed infrastructure clients, which means about 4,600 accounts, including about 75 percent of the Fortune 100.)

Read 2 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Posted in News | Leave a comment

The Supreme Court is taking on Google and Oracle one last time

Source: OSNews

Article note: There is the summary I was looking for.

Ten years after Oracle first sued Google over the code in the Android platform, the two tech giants are finally facing off in the Supreme Court. Since then, there have been three trials and two appeals. Billions of dollars are at stake; many millions have been likely spent on a parade of seasoned litigators, expert witnesses, and bizarre trial exhibits intended to explain programming to non-technical juries. All this may be coming to an anticlimactic close on Wednesday morning, with a teleconference Supreme Court oral argument in the middle of a pandemic.

Google must win this case. Not because Google somehow deserves it, but because Oracle and its CEO are the scum of the earth dead set on destroying the very foundations of programming.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

I built a lay-down desk

Source: Hacker News

Article note: I still have the articulating bedframe that was my bed+recliner in my studio in my office at home, because "conformantly reclined with a laptop" really is a pretty good way to do some kinds of work. Quite a bit of what I do lately requires my double monitor + work area with overhead camera setup, which gives me limited ability to change my position (and that setup isn't readily adapted to standing), but I still mix it up when I can. I'm convinced the problem with almost all "ergonomic" solutions is basically that it's bad to spend so much time in any one position, so varying your shit is the real key. That's also part of my attraction to split keyboards and such - I can rearrange myself and keep working.
Comments
Posted in News | Leave a comment

Why I left my tenured academic job

Source: Hacker News

Article note: That looks like a solid "telling it like it is." This shit is why I'm so bullish on the whole "primarily instructional position" thing I've been angling for.
Comments
Posted in News | Leave a comment

Open-source self-hosted comments systems for static websites

Source: Hacker News

Article note: I stay on Wordpress despite it being a bloated mess of legacy PHP because every time I look at replacing the parts with something less-ugly, I discover there are _massive_ feature holes even without working out the plumbing.
Comments
Posted in News | Leave a comment

The truth about ferrites

Source: Hacker News

Article note: This is really handy, I know all of this in theory, and in practice just kind of drop them on when weird shit happens, but have never seen a non-voodoo theory-practice connection piece like this.
Comments
Posted in News | Leave a comment

How Trump is radicalizing the left

Source: The Week: Most Recent Home Page Posts

Article note: Thoughtful. Timely. Draws useful equivalencies without overstretching them.

Among the weirder moments of this week's disastrous debate between President Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden was the brief discussion of Trump's recent executive order banning racial sensitivity training that addresses "white privilege" or "critical race theory" at federal agencies. Trump offered an incoherent defense of the ban while Biden defended sensitivity training as a matter of respect. While this exchange undoubtedly left at least 95 percent of viewers scratching their heads, it touches on an issue that some people say has turned them into reluctant Trump supporters: His opposition to knee-jerk "political correctness" or "wokeness."

Trump's liberal critics regard his stance as pandering to aggrieved whites. Unlike them, I believe the leftist ideology of wokeness is in fact deeply pernicious and dangerous to liberal democracy. But I also believe hitching the "anti-woke" cause to Trump is the worst answer possible. Trump is not the nemesis of "woke" zealotry; he's its best booster. Tuesday's debacle shows why.

"Woke" ideology holds that racism, sexism, and other bigotries permeate everything in our culture and that we are entirely defined by "privileged" or "oppressed" identities. (This is also the essence of "critical race theory," mentioned in Trump's executive order.) If "privileged," we must constantly self-scrutinize to avoid perpetuating oppression — whether by inadvertently interrupting a Black person or a woman, complimenting an immigrant's English, mispronouncing a non-English name, wearing fashion "appropriated" from a minority culture, writing a poem in a "marginalized person's" voice, or expressing an opinion deemed harmful to an oppressed group.

This dogma, steeped in collective guilt and hypervigilant policing of speech and behavior, is destructive to individual freedom and to human relations. In a mind-boggling recent example, one white New York City community education board member was berated by another for briefly holding a Black child — a friend's nephew — in his lap during a Zoom meeting because it was deemed a hurtful expression of white dominance.

This toxic brand of supposed "anti-racism" also animates much of the "diversity training" material uncovered by Christopher Rufo, the conservative activist whose work led to Trump's executive order. Some of it sounds like a caricature of "woke" white self-flagellation, with white employees told to reflect on how they benefit from "white supremacy," how they may have "caused harm" to nonwhite co-workers, or whether the art displayed in their homes features too many white people. Even workshops that don't take such a strident approach often encourage people to view others solely as members of racial or gender groups. (There is also considerable evidence that such training is useless or counterproductive.)

"Woke" dogma has also become a powerful and often stifling presence in mainstream media, universities, schools, and other cultural institutions, as well as large sectors of the corporate world. So when reluctant pro-Trumpist Danielle Pletka, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C., writes in The Washington Post that she fears "the virtue-signaling bullies who increasingly try to dominate or silence public discourse" and who "view every personal choice — from recipes to hairdos — through their twisted prisms of politics and culture," such concerns shouldn't be ridiculed or dismissed.

But is that a reason to vote for Trump — or another reason to vote against him?

What gives "wokeness" its cultural power is the widespread belief that it's a movement for equal human dignity and that opposition to it stems from racism, sexism, and other hate. Yet Trump is widely seen — and not just by the "woke" — as a man who traffics in bigoted and demeaning rhetoric. In an NBC/Marist poll in early August, two-thirds of American voters — including one-third of Republicans said Trump's response to the recent protests against racial injustice had "mostly increased tensions," and only about a third of American voters saw him as the better candidate on handling race relations.

Trump's history provides ample reasons for this perception. His quest for the presidency was born from a one-man jihad to cast the first Black president of the United States as an African interloper. His 2015 presidential announcement featured the claim that most immigrants from Mexico were drug smugglers, criminals, and rapists. (Later, he accused an Indiana-born judge of Mexican descent of being biased against him because "he's a Mexican.") He has demonized Muslims and railed against admitting immigrants from "shithole countries" like Haiti. The very day Trump issued his executive order banning racial "stereotyping and scapegoating" in diversity training, he was scapegoating Ilhan Omar, the Democratic congresswoman from Minnesota, for her Somali refugee background. "She's telling us how to run our country," he told his supporters at a rally. "How did you do where you came from? How is your country doing?"

Because of this history, attacks on "wokeness" or "political correctness" from Trump can only backfire. Not only will they reinforce "woke" leftists in their conviction that their only opposition comes from racists and bigots; more importantly, they will alienate many liberals and moderates who dislike "political correctness" but dislike Trumpism even more and don't want to be in the same camp with racists. (And that's not to mention the hypocrisy of Trump posturing as a warrior for free speech while applauding physical violence against journalists or advocating prison for protesters who burn the American flag.)

There are other ways having Trump as president is a boon to "wokeness." For one, it lends some credibility to claims that white male supremacy in America remains deeply entrenched. (I know people online who lurched from center-left to far left after 2016, claiming their eyes have been opened to the truth about racism and patriarchy. I believe they are wrong — the reasons for Trump's election victory were far more complex—but such a trend does exist.) No less important, given the multifaceted disaster of this administration, complaints about college radicals, diversity consultants, and left-wing bloggers and Twitter activists are sure to be seen by many as a case of misplaced priorities.

The issue isn't simply that Trump is a bad ally for those who oppose "woke" zealotry because he's a bad person; it's that he's bad in specific ways that make him a counterproductive ally on this issue.

Tuesday's debate confirms this. When asked about the ban on "critical race theory"-based sensitivity training, Trump gave a rambling reply that showed he had no idea what he was talking about and was simply parroting things heard on Fox News. (The most specific he got was to say that such training "teaches people to hate our country.") Meanwhile, Biden's response, which stressed the importance of understanding other people's feelings and bringing people together, was far too benign a description of what happens at many workplaces in the name of "sensitivity" and "diversity." But for most Americans, it struck the right note on the underlying issues.

Those who argue that Trump deserves your vote because of his stance on the culture wars say that no one else is standing up to the left leviathan. But this is simply not true: Witness, for instance, the recent Harper's magazine letter signed mostly by anti-Trump liberals, denouncing leftist intolerance and defending open debate. (Full disclosure: I also signed this letter.) One could counter that Trump offers action instead of words. But even assuming that his ban on "stereotyping and scapegoating" in diversity training targets genuinely toxic programs, it only affects a small fraction of the workforce. Meanwhile, the inevitable backlash is likely to cause numerous public and private organizations to strengthen their commitment to diversity training — including the toxic kind.

It's indisputable that the far left has too much influence in today's Democratic Party. But Biden's victory as a moderate can give the saner and more sensible people a chance to regain ground in both major parties. White identity politics on the right and "woke" identity politics on the left feed off each other. A Trump victory would just perpetuate this vicious cycle.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

President Trump: “Melania and I tested positive for COVID-19”

Source: Ars Technica

Article note: This is feeling like a little dose of cosmic justice. And yet, still pretty on brand for 2020.
White House in Washington, DC.

Enlarge / White House in Washington, DC. (credit: Getty)

Hours after White House aide Hope Hicks reportedly tested positive for COVID-19, President Donald Trump told the public that both he and First Lady Melania Trump had also tested positive for the virus, as determined by a test administered on Thursday.

"Tonight, @FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19," Trump stated on his Twitter account on early Friday morning. "We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately." This was followed by White House physician Sean Conley saying he'd "received confirmation" of that news, adding that the couple "plan[s] to remain at home within the White House during their convalescence." As of press time, no further details have been disclosed about either the president or first lady's physical condition.

Reports about Hicks' contraction of the virus mention a timeline of her exhibiting mild symptoms on Wednesday while traveling with Trump, followed by a reportedly positive test result Wednesday evening. Later on Thursday, after Trump had already traveled to a fundraiser at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, he described Hicks' test results. Hours later, he disclosed his own test result.

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Workers at U of Kentucky concerned about COVID strategies

Source: Inside Higher Ed (news)

Article note: Oh look, we're in the news for our "plan." When they had modality change cut-off with only a few hours notice as the mass-move to online was starting just be fore the semester, it was pretty clear the plan was "retain a maximum number of students until we pass the refund date at all costs." There has only been voluntary testing for the last month or so, and the absenteeism is _drastically_ higher than would be explained by the 4% positivity rate, so my current expectation is that our rates are vastly higher than reported. If we suddenly go remote ~ Oct. 26th (Last day to withdraw), my suspicions will be confirmed, and there should be an external investigation about what the real plan was, because it sure feels like "We need the money and it probably won't kill very many students."

The University of Kentucky has had more employees become infected with COVID-19 since mid-August than any other workplace in Lexington, the Lexington Herald-Leader has reported. At 103 infections from Aug. 13 to Sept. 14, the university has had more employees infected than the next nine employers -- including Amazon, Chik-Fil-A and grocery chain Kroger -- combined. That includes, but is certainly not limited to, faculty.

Workers at the university have said the administration is providing adequate personal protective equipment but not comprehensively carrying out other measures that the state has mandated for businesses.

Kentucky’s Healthy at Work minimums for businesses say workplaces must check temperatures of employees before work or instruct workers to take their own temperatures within 24 hours before reporting on the job. Some workers say neither of those things have happened.

“There’s no temperature checks,” said Donald Moore, a custodian with the university for 15 years. “They don’t tell us to take it at home.”

Matt Heil, circulation staff at the UK Law Library, made a similar assessment. “There’s no temperature check, and they’ve given us no guidelines about anything like that, either.”

“They just don’t mention it,” said Pierre Smith, a groundskeeper at the university.

Despite being the Lexington workplace with the highest number of cases among employees, the university has pushed back against using comparisons with other businesses to evaluate its infection rate.

“I don’t believe the comparison tells you much -- given our size and the amount of testing, tracing, screening and tracking we are doing compared to anyone else,” a spokesperson for the university said via email. “The University of Kentucky is the region’s largest employer -- by far, and so should be expected to have the largest number of positive cases. Without knowing the telecommuting, social distancing, mask, screening, tracing and testing policies at each of these businesses, it is not possible to make a fair comparison across these employers.”

In 2019, the university had 17,500 employees.

The university has also pointed out that it asks employees and students to screen themselves daily through an emailed questionnaire.

“We require everyone who comes on campus to screen. It is based on the [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]’s algorithm for screening,” a spokesperson for the university said via email, in response to a question about temperature checks. “Further, every student who comes to campus or who lives on [campus] was provided a package that includes a thermometer, two masks, hand sanitizer and other health and safety tools.”

That screener is also part of Kentucky COVID-19 regulations for workplaces. The questions the UK screener asks are mostly in line with, but slightly different from, the ones the state says businesses must ask.

While the state has said every employee should be asked about each symptom of COVID-19 and respond to whether they’ve felt each one individually, the UK screener first asks employees if they are ill. If they answer yes, the survey provides a general follow-up question about symptoms. Other questions on the survey are also slightly different from the state guidelines.

Despite state regulations that say businesses and organizations should allow employees to telework to the greatest extent possible, some instructors at the university have said they have been pressured to teach in person even as case numbers have risen.

Michael McEwen, an M.F.A. student in creative writing, said he originally chose to teach in person, wanting to hold his class outside. But students in his environmental writing class showed some discomfort with that plan, McEwen said, and so after a class vote he decided to instead hold optionally in-person classes once every two weeks.

McEwen was told by a department chair that he needed to increase in-person class time to more than 50 percent of total class hours. Students had paid more for designated face-to-face classes. Otherwise, McEwen said he was told, he could tell students he was evaluating the situation for two weeks, but that the class would eventually be in person. He is now holding in-person classes once per week.

The university has said faculty have flexibility and choice of modality.

“Faculty have discretion regarding the modality in which they teach,” a university spokesperson said via email. “Faculty have been using that flexibility to make quick decisions, in fact, about changing modality when they need to as part of serving their needs and the needs of our students.”

The employee union -- United Campus Workers Kentucky -- has said it has reported the university for noncompliance with state regulations.

Rising Cases

According to local health department data, the University of Kentucky has seen over 2,000 cases among its students on campus. University students now account for 25 percent of Fayette County’s total COVID-19 cases.

On Wednesday, Fayette County was placed in the “red zone” for school reopening, meaning community spread is high enough that public schools must give fully remote instruction and cannot run extracurriculars or sports.

“Our understanding is that the increase in the incidence rate is directly linked to cases among University of Kentucky students,” Manny Caulk, superintendent of Fayette County Public Schools, wrote in a message to families Wednesday. “We have made contact with officials at the University of Kentucky to learn more about whether those cases are within an isolated UK cohort, or indicative of a wider community spread.”

But the university has defended its strategy.

“We have taken a data-driving, methodical approach to our response throughout this process. That hasn’t changed. We’ve followed the numbers and the science and we’ve always acted with our guiding principle in mind -- doing what is best for the health, safety and well-being of our campus community,” a university spokesperson said via email.

The fact that UK students account for 25 percent of total cases in the county is cumulative, he said, and does not represent the impact at this moment in time.

“Also, it is reliant on self-reported enrollment information and utilizes a wide variety of testing sources. Most importantly, positive cases are a function of testing and without normalizing across the various COVID-19 response, screening, tracing and testing policies, it is not possible to compare across entities and make a fair comparison as to whether this percentage is ‘good’ or ‘bad.’”

On Friday, the county health department announced it had 69 new COVID-19 cases for its daily tally. Thirty-one of those cases were college students.

The university has conducted more than 31,000 tests, including mandatory initial tests for students in dorms and Greek life, and has seen 1,300 positive results. The administration has recently launched wastewater testing and randomized student testing, and -- after insistence from the employee union -- is now offering free testing for faculty and staff.

“As demonstrated by our number of active cases, which has largely remained stable over the past several weeks, we believe we are effectively managing the spread of this disease,” the spokesperson said. According to a public dashboard, UK has more than 430 active cases. But seven-day averages for new cases, the university has said, are going down.

The employees’ union has pushed for more from the administration, including hazard pay, affordable health care for staff and a pledge to cover health-care costs associated with COVID-19 for on-campus workers.

Facilities workers, the union has said, are disproportionately Black and at high risk for COVID-19.

“If anybody’s got any chance of becoming infected, it’s us,” said Moore, the custodian, who is 57.

Smith, the groundskeeper, said he’s concerned about catching the virus. He is 54 and his girlfriend uses a breathing machine. He says students don’t always keep their masks on.

“I just kind of stay to myself and stay in a bubble,” he said. “I just don’t talk to anybody.”

Khari Gardner, a senior and the founder of the Movement for Black Lives campus organization, said his group has endorsed the union’s demands.

“It’s getting to an alarming point where UK has to make a decision about how they’re going to move forward,” Gardner said. “It’s starting to affect the community.”

“It’s time for UK to really take a chance and show that they care about the community,” he added. “We’re asking for the university to really take a stand and realize we’re not just numbers, percentages and dollar signs.”

Editorial Tags: 
Image Source: 
Andy Lyons/Getty Images
Is this diversity newsletter?: 
Newsletter Order: 
0
Disable left side advertisement?: 
Is this Career Advice newsletter?: 
Magazine treatment: 
Trending: 
Trending text: 
When Staff Get Sick
Trending order: 
2
Display Promo Box: 
Live Updates: 
liveupdates0
Posted in News | Leave a comment