We tried to publish a replication of a Science paper in Science

Source: Hacker News

Article note: Remind me again how the academic publication process isn't _purely_ about career advancement and enriching parasitic publishers? Two questions for other current academics: 1. When was the last time you could/did meaningfully evaluate something you received for peer review? 2. When was the last time you learned something new in your area from a journal pub, not a discussion online or at a conference 8+ months before?
This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *